Be the first to ask a question about A Brief History of Heresy. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Community Reviews. Showing Rating details. Sort order. May 16, Casper Denck rated it liked it Shelves: church-history. On first sitting down to write this review I was going to start with quite a negative review stating that this had been given an inaccurate title and that the nearest to history was its eclectic mention of various — predominately medieval — heresies, however, on reflection this is a little unfair.
If you are looking for a narrative history of the development of orthodoxy and the boundaries of acceptable divergence then this is not the book for you I was. In the first chapter Evans introduces the idea of Christian Unity and its importance for self-identity. Evans suggests that there needs to be a consensus of common ideals and therefore, with the geographical divergence of Christian communities there was a move towards ecclesiastical centralisation under a strong theology of papal primacy.
In the second and third chapters Evans delineates what are to be considered two of the variants of heresy that consistently re-assert themselves. This branch of heresy is essentially intellectual and is represented by the Christological controversies of the fourth century of which Arianism is the archetype. The second type of heresy is less an overstepping of doctrinal boundaries but the lack of appropriate orthopraxis.
Where the first type of heretic was a rationalistic one, the second was charismatic and political, often involving the call to return to the apostolic primitive church and rebelling against the corruption of the establishment, these movements were often supported by lower social classes than the elite higher clergy. Hence this second group was, on one level less theological, the concern being mainly a moral one.
This is a helpful clarification by Evans. The next two chapters offer some historical comments on each of these tendencies. Chapter four outlines the main intellectual fault-lines of the rationalist heresies while chapter five offers a survey of the links of heresy to social challenge which characterise the charismatic fringe.
By way of criticism I would perhaps make one point. Whilst this book, as I mentioned earlier, is not strictly a history the limited scope of the examples used did confuse me. Aside from discussion of early heresies and the occasional aside about modern movement I did wonder whether Evans thought heresy began and ended in the middle ages; this is not entirely surprising as this is her academic specialty.
Nonetheless, a more comprehensive range of historical examples would have been helpful. This is particularly pertinent to her closing chapter when she discusses contemporary approaches to doctrinal diversity. The twentieth and twenty-first centuries have had their own heresy trials and yet these were not discussed. This seems a great shame. This book is aimed at providing an introduction that does not pre-suppose theological knowledge and this I think has been achieved very well.
In clear writing Evans has offered a good, although incomplete, introduction to the idea of heresy as well as introducing its most famous proponents. Evans is quite objective and sees things as I understand them. And I have the historian's view, so this is accurate. The Church has been badly assessed on this issue. Most people view heresy from the context of human rights thought of today. In times when executions and exile were ordinary, the Church's treatment of heretics was, for the most part, very lenient.
This is true, but we must remember that Mr. This is true, but we must remember that what was done in the treatment of heresy by the Church was done for the benefit of souls. Tolerance of differing views even heretical views is only a very modern idea, as the last chapter of the book describes. Mistakes were made on both sides, sometimes with good intentions, sometimes for political reasons. But there is nothing that should embarrass the Roman Christian. Parodies of the oppressed can be used to reinforce and maintain established hegemonic discourses or already held ideological positions, as can humor in general see, e.
Lewis Satirical parodies, then, are those depictions which reference other cultural phenomena for critical purposes. As a subgenre of comedy, satire is a weapon which is directed with moral force at a target. An investigation of the satire itself and not its reception asks how it is constructed which attributes of its targets are emphasized or ignored, which behaviors and beliefs are lauded or chastised, how the moral point is conveyed, and how the audience is imagined , how and where it is presented, what moral is being conveyed, and what is its significance see also Feinberg ; Kercher ; Gray et al.
The writers are the most significant contributors to The Simpsons ' satire. It takes roughly nine months to make one episode of The Simpsons , and scripts go through numerous rewrites as they move from their initial stages through voice recordings, storyboards, overseas animation, and final edits before being aired. Jokes have to hold up over time. If they become stale through repeated retellings, they will be replaced.
As the production team can hear a single joke repeated dozens of times over the course of bringing an episode to air, only those that persistently resonate with the group will survive. Instead, every writer who enters the room—and the directors and showrunners executive producers who corral them—has preconceived notions about religion.
Together, through the process of writing jokes, they are able to create a vision that is a product of the group more than any single individual. Jean, Meyer, and Groening all note that the episode is far more religious than any of them individually and that it does not necessarily reflect their individual lack of belief or antipathy toward religion. Were The Simpsons jokes merely a reflection of their biases, the program would look much different and carry a more cynical and caustic tone.
That said, not every writer has equal impact upon their peers. Meyer is the undisputed king of The Simpsons ' writing room—even though he is now more distanced from the program he has helped craft since the show began. There's a built-up tension in religion, and if you can release it, you'll get a huge and satisfying laugh. For Meyer, jokes at religion's expense come from his understanding that the Catholic Church and other social institutions did not care about him, no matter how much he invested in them Spiznagel This sense of disproportionate punishment and institutional alienation has found its way into The Simpsons ' treatment of religion, as we will clearly see with the way that Ned Flanders' political evangelicalism is satirized.
Meyer's is not the only voice that has shaped The Simpsons ' take on religion, although many of his compatriots share his perspective see Pinsky : — The program has included some committed Protestants over the years, and Pinsky includes brief quotations from former writers Jeff Martin and Steve Tompkins. They each admitted that they were religious minorities in the writing room, but that their jokes were given the same consideration as everyone else's : — I believe the quality of humor is in indirect proportion to one's true belief.
The more those beliefs are put in, the less funny it gets. Tompkins' insights should be kept at the forefront of an analysis of The Simpsons ' satire, as it emphasizes the importance of constraining a writer's personal beliefs to serve the narrative they are writing and the fact that the program's humor is crafted collectively around shared assumptions about what is congruent with the characters' personalities.
Those personalities, and the shared cultural assumptions about religion that exist among the writers, are born of people such as Groening and Meyer who view authority, blind faith, and obedience with suspicion. Most of the writers are atheists from Catholic or Jewish backgrounds. Indeed, Tompkins did not want Pinsky to identify him as a committed Christian because it could ruin his career in Hollywood Pinsky : The cultural patterns of respecting good people while completely disagreeing with their religious perspectives characterizes the way that Simpsons writers talk about Ned Flanders and other deeply religious characters in the program.
This cultural treatment of religion is embedded in The Simpsons ' characters, writers, and ethos, as we will see. For these reasons, I discuss The Simpsons ' satire not as a reflection of any one particular individual, but as a dynamic group product that has been crafted by hundreds of individuals over the program's twenty-four seasons.
The writing staff's diversity, the recognition that the characters do not outright reflect their creators' religious biases but rather exist in a consistent universe of their own, and the fact that the program airs on FOX and is not sponsored by any religious tradition puts The Simpsons ' humor outside any religious tradition it criticizes. For those studying religious humor, external satires of a religious tradition are important examples for understanding how that religion is treated in the wider cultural context.
I make a distinction between at least two types of religious humor: humor from inside a religious tradition and humor from the outside. Typically, scholars of humor's religious importance treat it from the inside and see it as a tool of revelation, following along the same lines as Gray's interpretation of parody as a tool of resistance. Conrad Hyers , , , has been this tradition's most vocal proponent. For Hyers, there are three types of laughter which correspond to three levels of humor: Under this model, religious humor from within the world's traditions is treated as having a revelatory effect.
It strips away the pompousness of human activity, revealing a transcendent truth. For Hyers, the laughter of paradise regained takes us beyond ridicule to something healing and wholesome. Seeing humor as a means of grace and acceptance—as a way of connecting us to some transcendent reality beyond our socially constructed conflicts—is echoed in the works of other scholars see, e. It is not, however, particularly helpful in understanding the politics involved in interpreting others' religious beliefs and behaviors. In other words, the jokes are not funny because they are true.
They are funny because the culturally contextualized people composing them think that they represent a larger truth which is based on their assumptions about religion, religious institutions, and the value of religious life which is then filtered through their sense of humor. The way Ned Flanders is presented demonstrates this distinction nicely. The laughter of paradise regained, which comes from inclusiveness and a vision of the world that reflects reconciliation. Among Simpsons commentators, there are two major summaries of Ned Flanders and his role as a caricature of evangelical Christianity.
Pinsky : 46—69 portrays him positively, as a representative evangelical who tries to be a genuinely good person, only briefly acknowledging some of Ned's more politically conservative activities 50— Heit : 83—95 argues that Ned reflects Christianity's dark side see also Turner : ; Henry : —, — When faced with diametric disagreements like these, we often find that the situation is more nuanced than either analyst permits.
Here, we see a two-pronged attack on mainstream life in the United States. First, there is the attempt at moral reform through public action on issues such as homosexuality, abortion rights, prayer in public schools, and media content. Second, there is the promotion of an alternative symbolic universe rooted in conservative Christianity's biblical interpretation and morality.
The Simpsons ' satirical gaze focuses on these evangelical characteristics. Pinsky's discussions of Ned's Christian morality, on the other hand, suggest that he also represents the tradition's moral aspects that The Simpsons portrays as valuable.
This complicates Ned's character, moving him away from being a purely negative American evangelical caricature and making him into a plausible representative of evangelical values. Ned's evangelicalism has deep roots in American culture. Today's evangelicals stand upon a rich and colorful history that stretches back to the First Great Awakening. Evangelicalism had a strong public presence during the nineteenth century, but with increased questions about biblical inerrancy introduced through German higher biblical criticism, intellectual skeptics influenced by Darwinism, and the fundamentalist retraction from the mainline Protestant denominations after the Scopes trial in , conservative evangelicals withdrew from the American mainstream into their own isolated communities and abandoned the world to its sinful nature Marsden However, this did not last long, as less conservative evangelicals started actively engaging the culture at large in the early s, starting with the National Association of Evangelicals' NAE founding in St.
Louis in to combat the liberal Federal Council of Churches. After a lull in political engagement into the s, evangelicals were drawn back into the public square because of church and state issues regarding prayer in public schools and the landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion. Ronald Reagan's election in marked a new high point for conservative religion's political influence, a phenomenon repeated when George W.
Bush took the presidency in and with strong conservative Christian support. Stone ; C. Smith : 2—19, ; Hankins Ned most closely resembles historian Randall Balmer's broad description of evangelicals which includes Pentecostals, Fundamentalists, and other conservative Protestants , making for the widest range of possible jokes coming from the mouth of one character—an ironic choice on The Simpsons ' creators' part, since Balmer aptly demonstrates the movement's internal diversity.
Ned embodies those subcultural elements within evangelicalism which combine right wing politics with a sincere desire to live as Christians. Ned's dark side can be seen in his overprotective parenting and his role in Springfield's moral watchdog groups. In an extended sequence on the DVD version of this episode, Ned refuses to explain Planned Parenthood to the boys because he is busy writing down doctors' names being listed on the screen.
Parodying the Lutheran Church of America's popular Davey and Goliath cartoon from the s and s, The Simpsons takes Davey and Goliath 's association with Christian teachings of love, forgiveness, and tolerance and inverts it, suggesting that evangelicals share abortion clinic bombers' moral self-righteousness and willingness to use violence to achieve their ends. These quotations reference and satirize politically engaged evangelicals see Jelen The above examples point out symbolic identity markers that different evangelical groups have projected into American consciousness.
References to courts controlling women's bodies and attacks on Planned Parenthood recall the evangelical anti-abortion lobby of the late twentieth century, which saw sit-ins at abortion clinics and the harassment of women seeking abortions. In some cases, doctors were murdered and properties burned. Anti-abortion has become a significant item in evangelicalism's symbolic boundaries and is a litmus test for political support see, e.
Abortion decisions are not the only legal issues evangelicals have challenged. When Ned complains that the schools cannot force Bart to pray, he references 's Engel v. Vitale , 's Abington School District v. Schempp , and 's Lemon v. Kurtzman Supreme Court decisions banning school board—drafted prayers and prohibiting religion's promotion in public schools.
These are contentious decisions and evangelicals continually seek ways to circumvent them see, e. In this section's opening paragraph, I referenced Ned's quote about the America of yesteryear that only exists in the minds of Republicans. As school prayer and antiabortion are popularly associated with evangelical support for the Republican Party, it comes as little surprise that The Simpsons would use its evangelical character to satirize the Republican Party's base's religio-politics, because these issues are seen as antithetical to the secularism The Simpsons generally endorses.
The Flanders home and family are also caricatures of American evangelicals. This is made readily apparent in the bombardment scene when, asking questions from the Vulgate of Saint Jerome, Ned questions the children about their biblical knowledge: NED. Well, guess!korovskiy.com.ua/components/2019-04-11/3265-goroskop-na-segodnya.php
HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CHRISTIANITY
Book of Revelations, fire-breathing lion's head, tail made out of snakes. Who else could it be? The serpent of Rehoboam? When Maude says that these are the things the children should have learned in baptism class, Lisa acknowledges that they were never baptized.
After Ned faints and recovers, he decides to take the children to the Springfield River and baptize them for the good of their immortal souls. Once Homer and Marge discover this, they come and rescue the children. The Flanders are loving and caring, but far too entrenched in fundamentalist conceptions of family values for The Simpsons. Emphasizing Rod and Todd's sheltered lives suggests that the Flanders have built a barrier to the outside world, protecting themselves with evangelical trappings.
Ned is not always a moral crusader. He can also be a model of compassion, generosity, and neighborliness. Indeed, Ned is important in the way that he embodies the ideal type of a kind, caring Christian—even if that type becomes corrupted by his moralizing and Christian exclusiveness. Throughout the series, we see Ned practice neighborly love, even though Homer is one of the most obnoxious characters anyone could ever imagine living beside.
A New History of Shinto (Blackwell Brief Histories of Religion) - PDF Free Download
From early in the second season, Ned seeks help from the local minister, Rev. Timothy Lovejoy, whenever he feels he has failed at this task of spreading the good news. Homer's friendship, however, quickly becomes overbearing. Ned wants to be a good neighbor, but ends up lying to Homer to get some time with his family. Eventually, he tries to escape from Homer and Ned is stopped by the police after escaping his neighbor.
The church bus passes him and everybody judges Ned while praising Homer's good works. Dejected, embarrassed, and angry, Ned is eventually redeemed after Homer declares that Ned is the most caring person he knows. Homer tracks him down, begging him to come back because the new neighbor is not nearly as gracious with Homer's failings as Ned. Yet when two new tenants are about to move in, Ned has a change of heart. And you can't be a saint unless you live among the lepers.
Indeed, Ned's willingness to extend a helping hand makes him an easy foil for Homer's abuse, but evangelicalism's ethical vision of loving others and doing the right thing dwells beneath the humor Homer's torments generate. Ned legitimates Christianity's ethical side. While the institutional and culture warrior elements of Ned's character are decried, his faith is affirmed as ethical. Pinsky, emphasizing the good in religion that The Simpsons supports, focuses on these aspects of Ned's personality. Ned's two major crises of faith reveal his spiritual depth.
Uh, if you need additional solace by the way I've got a copy of something or other by Art Linkletter in my office. I've always been nice to people, I don't drink or dance or swear. I've even kept kosher just to be on the safe side. I've done everything the Bible says, even the stuff that contradicts the other stuff! What more could I do? I feel like I'm coming apart here! I want to yell out but I just can't dang-diddly-do-dang-do-damn-diddly-darn do it!
Instead, religion's institutional concepts—the rules, dogmas, and rituals—have driven Ned toward a moral life. This is a deep faith developed within religion, and while Turner is right that the caricatured fundamentalism Ned can represent is satirized, this does not mean that it cannot provide a meaningful spiritual experience despite its cultural baggage.
Understanding Flanders' value for The Simpsons ' satire requires seeing past caricatures, realizing that The Simpsons ' creative team takes what it deems positive traits from different religions and then shows how those traits can fruitfully enrich a character's life. Well, I've had it! When he arrives, he walks into a performance by the Christian rock band Covenant, and lead singer Rachel Jordan's lyrics convince him that putting his faith in God will carry him through this dark time.
Unlike the last time, Ned's prayers are indirectly answered, with the church and Christianity facilitating his healing. While The Simpsons has not spared Ned's politics, parenting, or preachiness, how Ned copes with pain demonstrates a recognition and acceptance of the ways evangelicals can find meaningful answers to difficult problems through their religious traditions. The Simpsons is a popular culture product that is crafted from a variety of cultural narratives and which supports some cultural and political positions over others, contributing to its popularity.
Framing Ned as a satirical caricature allows The Simpsons to engage in a narrative which parodies evangelicals and, in turn, produces stories about how they should be treated among the broad spectrum of American religious behaviors and traditions. According to The Simpsons , evangelicals should be kept at arm's-length from politics.
All their attempts to engage American society result in nothing but overreaction, censorship, and discrimination. Ned's politics, which are based in historical evangelical concerns, are presented as a threat to the nation and as an exaggerated and misguided interpretation of Christianity. If this were all there were to Ned Flanders, he would not be a multifaceted character and could be easily dismissed.
Instead, his Christian spirituality makes him a moral and loving individual who is presented as finding meaning in more than just meeting his material needs, making his Christianity relevant.
- A brief history of heresy /G.R. Evans. – National Library.
- A Brief History of Christianity by Carter Lindberg (ebook)!
- Red Hot Chili Peppers - Californication (Bass).
- The New Transnational Activism?
- The Harvard Entrepreneurs Club Guide to Starting Your Own Business.
- Classical Studies: Mythology & Religion!
By presenting both positive and negative elements, The Simpsons makes Ned into more than a caricature—he is a moral example who captures cultural—political tensions. According to Pinsky, Ned represents the truth because he is a moral exemplar, the kind of neighbor we would all like to have.
This, however, ignores the dangerous elements of evangelicalism upon which Heit focuses. Truth, in this case, is very much a matter of interpretation. If you agree with Heit that the evangelical engagement which tries to censor popular culture, overturn Supreme Court decisions regarding the separation of church and state and legalizing abortion, and enforce a particular vision of Christian morality through the law is a bad thing, then this part of the satire rings true. By making these actions appear stupid, frivolous, and counter-productive, The Simpsons is engaged in promoting one specific story about a religious group, its rights, and the responses others should have toward it.
This is strengthened by the side of Ned that Pinsky emphasizes: the kind, neighborly Ned Flanders. If evangelicals only show their faces when they are living a personal morality which makes them better people, then The Simpsons promotes that as a good thing. But this contributes to a political discourse in which evangelicals are seen as negative contributors to American public life and does little to pose an alternative to the already tense political—religious relationships which continue to divide American politics.
The laughter is of paradise lost, not paradise regained. Satire is a powerful, if understudied, tool for communicating ideas about religious rights and roles in society. To start developing the picture, we are still in need of historical and cross-cultural examples of religious satire which are generated both within religious institutions and outside of them.
We are also in need of specialized theories which demonstrate how religious satire generated both inside and outside religious traditions is similar to and different from other forms of satire. These theories will need to be grounded in a broader framework of religious humor which focuses on its origins within cultural, religious, and political contexts rather than as a force for revelation.
This will assist us in developing a useful theory of religious humor. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.
Sign In or Create an Account. Sign In. Advanced Search. Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation. Volume Article Contents.