Uncategorized

Get PDF Business Law in Africa: Ohada and the Harmonization Process (Global Market Briefings)

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Business Law in Africa: Ohada and the Harmonization Process (Global Market Briefings) file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Business Law in Africa: Ohada and the Harmonization Process (Global Market Briefings) book. Happy reading Business Law in Africa: Ohada and the Harmonization Process (Global Market Briefings) Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Business Law in Africa: Ohada and the Harmonization Process (Global Market Briefings) at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Business Law in Africa: Ohada and the Harmonization Process (Global Market Briefings) Pocket Guide.

General investment banking activity decreased by 7 per cent in the first nine months of compared to the value recorded in the same period of according to an investment banking review of the Sub-Saharan region. This is in stark contrast with global investment banking fees that saw substantial increases. Acquisitions by companies headquartered in Mauritius and Zimbabwe accounted for This has largely been as a result of low investor confidence because of bribery and corruption related issues both in the private and public sector over the past couple of years in South Africa.

You are here

It appears that investors will take a bit longer to consider investing in South Africa after these well-publicised corruption scandals. But generally investment in Africa has been negatively affected by political uncertainty and policy unpredictability; and general inward looking investments by the major economies in the world. Gavin Davies, RDP, Hubert Segain and Richard Woods: In keeping with previous trends, the first half of has been dominated by activity in the energy and mining sectors.

The technology and telecommunication sectors also continue to be active. Sectors such as consumer goods, financial services and healthcare have all seen some activity. Developments in the telecoms and financial services sector remain the engines of this outbound activity, which has resulted in domestic companies making significant investments in technology.

As in all jurisdictions, shareholders accepting equity consideration will need to be diligent about the acquiring vehicle, and investors will need to plan to take shareholders through legal structures that may be unfamiliar to them. Where the acquirer is itself a local entity, local counsel will need to advise on any formalities required for the issuance or transfer of the equity consideration. In a number of African jurisdictions, exchange controls will apply to inbound and outbound currency flows, so it is important to check for any approval requirements at an early stage and plan for these as part of the deal timetable.

Since its establishment, the organisation has taken important steps to attract investment by helping to standardise business laws and implementing institutions across the continent. Perhaps the most notable of these efforts have been the moves to establish market norms for local security issues, dispute resolution procedures and most recently, the reliability and flexibility of structuring investments within the region. Another key development, in keeping with the trend for increasing convergence in commercial law across Africa, has been the establishment of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa Competition Commission CCC.

The CCC is a supranational body covering 19 countries across Eastern and Southern Africa that works to improve the integration of merger control regimes in the region. Steps have recently been taken to enhance such integration further by concluding memorandums of understanding, containing commitments to improve information exchange, increase opportunities for consultation between regulators and boost cooperation in the development of training programmes, with a number of domestic regulators.

The CCC has also recently introduced changes to reduce the breadth of its notification requirement and to introduce a cap on the filing fee. When combined with previous changes to clarify its jurisdictional test and to introduce the possibility of obtaining a comfort letter, we expect that the revised regime will provide even greater certainty for investors going forward. In contrast, navigating the regimes of increasingly interventionist domestic competition authorities may prove more difficult. Concerns of interventionism are particularly relevant in jurisdictions such as Botswana, Kenya, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe, where the public interest impact of a merger forms parts of the assessment.

Amendments to the South African Competition Act the Competition Act have been proposed which include an increased sensitivity towards foreign acquirers in South African mergers. The Competition Amendment Bill proposes to establish a framework within which a politically appointed committee the Committee may prohibit a proposed transaction that involves an acquisition by a foreign acquiring firm and relates to certain identified national security interests.

The power to prohibit or impose conditions on a merger on the grounds of national security is novel in South Africa.


  • Counselling Pupils in Schools: Skills and Strategies for Teachers.
  • Africa – the great opportunity.
  • On-line catalogue - African information centre.

While South Africa has been one of the leading jurisdictions in relation to the role of public interest factors in merger control, this assessment has, to date, been conducted by the competition authorities themselves as an integral part of their assessment of a merger including orthodox competition factors.

The Minister in the Presidency the Minister has power under the Competition Act to intervene in the merger control process — effectively as an interested third party — where this is warranted on public interest grounds. In recent years, in high-profile transactions involving the acquisition of South African entities by large international corporations, a practice has developed of first approaching the Minister and entering into negotiations as to the type of commitments that might be appropriate to address the public interest grounds provided for in the Competition Act.

This could lead to a negotiated agreement between the parties and the Minister that is incorporated into the ordinary merger approval process conducted by the competition authorities — the proposed amendments appear to be a codification of the practice, to an extent. However, the proposed section goes further, as it would grant a political body the power to prohibit a merger independently of the competition authorities and thereby prevent the ordinary merger control process from occurring at all.

Furthermore, the list of national security interests contemplated is extremely broad — the provisions go far beyond traditional public interest factors that have been the focus of legitimate ministerial intervention to date. In addition, it is not clear what would classify as sensitive technology, important goods or services, infrastructure essential to the economic well-being of citizens, or a matter that could impact on the economic and social stability of South Africa generally.

Reproduced with permission of the author. Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master of Laws LL. Degree January, This effort was made possible by the grace of Lord Ganesha who gave me the strength and determination to complete this work. I would like to express my deepest and sincere heartfelt gratitude to my supervisor Sukhninder Panesar. He provided me with the unflinching support and my experiences under his tutelage have helped me to understand 'International Business Law' better than I would ever have imagined I could.

I am also grateful to all my module tutors who did their best to share their wealth of knowledge during my course. Beth Richards Bray, Margaret Liu and Angela Marshall have provided much interesting discussion and new content as well as plenty of assessments. A special thank you must go to the LL. Stephen Foster for being very efficient in responding to my academic need.

I would also like to convey my regards to the Law Librarian Sue White for assisting me towards the access to online research. Throughout my work on quite a consistent basis I referenced eminent Professor Roy Goode for the textbook: Transnational Commercial Law he wrote and several articles. This note of gratitude would be imperfect without him being given a mention. This dissertation is dedicated to my lovely Aunty- Dr. Alpana Sharma who is the greatest source of inspiration for her prayers and encouragement throughout my education even when it was not convenient.

I, Puja Soni hereby certify that this work is absolutely the result of my own research, and confirm that the originality of this work, which has neither been presented in whole nor in part for another Masters degree elsewhere. References to other people's works and academic resources have been duly acknowledged. Over the last two hundred years, traders, lawyers and scholars gathered in several venues to advocate harmonization and unification in transnational commercial law.

The justification for such recommendation lies in the acknowledgment that it brings with itself diverse virtues that affects cross border transactions. It further diminish various risks inherent in international business for instance, conflict of laws.

In order to achieve this goal various international instruments are promulgated including conventions and model laws. At present the most glorious endeavour that has advanced harmonization is the adoption of United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods by the majority of the countries. However, the non- ratification of this Convention by the United Kingdom and lack of transnational business court paralyzed its triumphant.

In light of this, this dissertation examines the process of the harmonisation and unification in light of the Convention of the International Sale of Goods. The twentieth century has witnessed an enormous augmentation in the cross border commercial activities. One of the best ways to remove such barrier is harmonization of business laws that is 'used as a surrogate to discuss the creation of international commercial law". Harmonization is brought in almost every field of business law for example, trade and patents.

As "the contract of sale is the backbone of international trade in all countries, irrespective of their legal tradition or level of economic development" [4] it is noteworthy to mention the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods that is acknowledged as the milestone of harmonization and unification of business laws. This dissertation is aimed to bring various aspects of harmonization of business laws in the light of the U. Convention on Sales law Considering the nature of this research, the author will, in the course of this dissertation, use the two expressions "commercial law" and "business law" interchangeably.

Correspondingly "international business law" and "transnational commercial law" are referred reciprocally. It is in this light, Chapter Two begins with an introduction to the subject matter: international business together with a succinct overview of the various kinds in which international commercial transactions can be undertaken: trade, licensing and foreign direct investment. Further this chapter explores the various laws that affect transactions operating overseas: domestic law, private international law and public international law.

The second segment of this Chapter examines the chronological framework of the development of the international business law. Particularly it will focus on the lex mercatoria which was the first instance of the harmonization of business laws. Afterwards it will examine the various significant sources of international business law, for example, international conventions, model laws, and general principles of international law. At the end of this Chapter, the reader can find a demonstration of the several risks inherent in business world.

Particularly it will focus on four significant uncertainties, for instance, currency risk and political risk. Harmonization is a concept of antiquity. However it came into play a prominent role after Second World War with the development of the globalization. In order to provide a framework about harmonization, Chapter Three will begin with the several controversial definition of the harmonization put forwarded by eminent scholars, for instance, professor Goode, professor Ziegel and Leebron altogether with the difference between the colonial harmonization and modern harmonization. Although harmonization is different from various other concepts such as codification, in this dissertation it will only focus on the differentiation between harmonization and unification of laws due to shortage of word limit.

Subsequently it will explores the two significant advantages of harmonization and unification of business laws. It will begin with the most welcomed advantage of the harmonization that is uniformity of laws in place of diverse laws provided by various jurisdictions. Subsequently it will critically examine the second advantage of harmonization: minimising of transactional expenses.

On the side of the harmonization there appear several disadvantages and thus it is appreciated to provide arguments that are against the harmonization. However it will look only on the two crucial disadvantages of harmonization: the virtues of diverse laws and restrained interpretation by national courts of the international instruments.

Chapter Four paint the landscape of various instruments that contribute in bringing harmonization of business laws directly or indirectly. This Chapter gives an overview of these Organizations with their purposes. In what ways these Organization brought harmonisations is also a central attraction of this Chapter.

Chapter Five, that is the crucial part of this piece of work, commences with the succinct historical framework of the most auspicious effort of harmonization till date: United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods hereinafter 'CISG' or 'Vienna Convention'.

It is then preceded with the various foundations on which its achievement is based, for instance, the enormous number of ratification by the countries and the groundbreaking impact on various other existing instruments. This Chapter also aims to clarify its success in preview of the failures of its predecessors.

Find a Lawyer

Then it will explore the other side of the coin: its criticism. It is appreciated because a comprehensive preview of the CISG will be curtailed without presenting arguments against the CISG that are put forwarded by the eminent scholars. The most severe attack on its success lies in the non- ratification of the Convention by the United Kingdom hereinafter 'UK'. In order to provide an overview of this blunt criticism, this Chapter at the end aims to provide various justification for UK's non- ratification and efforts initiated by the United Kingdom's government in this concern.

Chapter Six will bestow a conclusion by concocting a concrete evaluation on the degree of harmonization and unification achieved so far by the CISG in international trade transactions. The landscape of "international business" so far has not enjoyed a discrete characterization that may acquire the harmony of scholars.

International business can take three forms: trade, foreign direct investment FDI , and licensing. FDI is defined as 'a form of equity investment which gives the investing firm control over its assets, property and subsidiaries in the host country'. However, a business crossing national frontiers is affected by three sets of laws.

Firstly, it is affected by the national laws as each country has a different domestic structure for controlling international activities, such as flow of goods. Many rules of this branch of law have direct impact to international commerce, for instance, rules relating to state succession resolving territorial disputes. For example, United Nations Convention on International Sale of Goods contains rules for international sale contracts. Transnational law may be summarized in the colourful words of eminent Professor of the United Kingdom- Roy Goode as: "a body of codified and uncodified principles and rules which cross national borders".

Thus there are three essential characteristics of this definition. Firstly, it encompasses all set of principles and rules that join two specific parties through the phenomenon of accountability that is, private law. International commercial law should be distinguished from international economic law.

Contrary, international business law deals with the legal organization of international, business transacted on the level of private law. International business law and international economic law, though, are analogous on various fronts. For instance issues related to the exploration of the validity of tariff and nontariff barriers, such as import quotas, may both distort trade and economic flows between countries.

However, the development of international business underwent metamorphosis over the following three stages. Evolution of commercial law predominantly took place during the Middle Ages in Europe manifesting itself in lex mercatoria or 'law of merchants'. However the intricately localised legal framework served as barriers to their intentions of expanding international business. For example, in the mid-fourteenth century the consolato del Mare , a collection of the customs of the sea observed in the Consular Court of Barcelona came to be accepted as governing law in the commercial centres of the Mediterranean.

There are varied interpretations of the concept of "Law merchant". However there existed a majority of scholarly work having a contrarian viewpoint from the ones above.

Unified business laws for Africa common law perspectives on OHADA

Donahue, for instance, points out to there being no existence of historical evidence that there ever was a law merchant. Furthermore, Professor Berman laid stress on the universal and objective traits of lex mercatoria. Additionally, Bane held that the unique characteristic of the law merchant was its flexibility; merchants were not legally bound by the local laws and thus were able to carry out best business practices. Merchants formed their own courts to adjudicate disputes in accordance with their own laws. Judges of such courts were merchants chosen from the relevant merchant community.

Such courts were established as a consequence of two reasons. As the modern nation-state concept developed during the sixteenth century, rulers of sovereign [68] states began to regard the autonomous lex mercatoria as an external threat to internal cohesiveness. The incorporation of the law merchant into municipal law was motivated by various factors.

Accordingly, the doors to national legal controls over international trade were openly to the king's courts and, as a result, the international character of the medieval lex mercatoria was eventually eroded. However, in , the law merchant was integrated into the common law of England by then two renowned common-law judges, Lord John Holt and William, Lord Mansfield. The reform which Lord Mansfield carried out when sitting with his special juryman at the Guildall of London, was ostensibly aimed at the simplification of commercial procedure and the creation of a body of harmonized commercial law, modern in character and in harmony with the principles of the common law.

Royal Exchange Assurance, it was held that: "The mercantile, in this respect, is the same all over the world". The second half of the nineteenth century saw the commencement of the growth of international business law. However, it was in the form of exploration rather than achievement. Law fashioned for a purely domestic transaction are not necessarily well adapted to a cross-border transaction".

It is clear that there existed law merchant during this phase that has international character rather than centralized to the European countries. There are several significant sources of transnational commercial law. The first important source is the customs of merchants or lex mercatoria , [86] which has explained above in great details. The second crucial source of business law is international instruments: conventions, model laws, and model rules. While a model law may be defined as 'a legislative text that is recommended to States for enactment as part of their national law'.

Furthermore, the narrow implication of the standard- term contracts is also necessary to refer under this heading. The reason is clarified by Professor Goode in these colourful words: 'The law of contract underpins all commercial transactions, and in most systems, a core principle is party autonomy'.

Business Law in Africa: Ohada and the Harmonization Process (Global Market Briefings)

Moreover, Restatements produced by eminent scholars are extremely influential in the development of business law. Their main object is 'to clarify, modernize, and otherwise improve the law'. Such restatements are developed in various fields, for instance contract and tort. In the contract field, pride of place goes to the two well known restatements: Principles of International Commercial Contracts and Principles of European Contract Law.

Business Law in Africa OHADA and the Harmonization Process

It has been rightly quipped that "The management of international business is the management of risk". First major risk in international commercial transactions involved the discrepancy in language and the cultural backgrounds of the transacting parties. Stumm Handel, GMBH , [] the court dismissed the plaintiff's action, holding that the plaintiff's failure to speak or read foreign language German was not grounds for invalidating any of the provisions of the contract.

Secondly, choice of currency involved therein also another imperative concern to be taken in consideration. For example, in the contract of sale from London to Dhaka, the London seller probably insists on being paid in U. As the Bangladeshi currency is devalued when the seller takes Taka to Bank of England, the bank may reject them on grounds that they cannot be exchanged for U. Another important aspect of currency risk is fluctuation in currency rate.

Bestselling Series

Bernina Distributors v. Bernina Sewing Machine Co. The court in this case held: "It is a risk of international business of which the parties should be aware and plan accordingly". The third kind of political or country risk stem from political instability or civil unrest, corrupt political leadership, frequent political change, war, terrorism, or regional violence in a country in which the firm is doing business. Cuba is the best example for having expropriated United-States-owned property in Final risk being that of legal environment differing from nation to nation.

The court cases pertaining international disputes have the downside of being prolonged and costly procedures. As transnational commercial activities have dramatically increase in the last 30 years due to globalizations, there is a greater demand for harmonization of commercial law at international level. Harmonization is a very ambiguous concept as different scholars have given divergent expositions. For instance, According to eminent scholar, Ziegel it can be understood as absolute uniformity of business laws for example conventions amongst the countries that have given recognition to those mandate.

However, it is argued that harmonization of laws is distinguished from unification of laws. It directs a change of rules, standards or processes in order to avoid conflicts and bring about equivalence". Similarly, Professor Bridge posits that "uniformity of law strives for identicality among the laws of the various states, while the goals of harmonization are not so fine-tuned".

Of course, there is an interaction between harmonising and unifying law. Arguably, harmonisation is the first, prudent step towards uniform solutions". While each of these expositions are controversial, it would be adequate for this dissertation purposes to compose an operational meaning of harmonization in transnational commercial law. Unification may be seen as the adoption by countries of a uniform legal criterion that governs specific aspects of international commercial transactions. Though it may appear that harmonization and unification has intrinsic worth, it is imperative to appreciate the justifications put forward by various scholars.

One of the main purposes, according to Professor Goode, of harmonization is to proxy 'uniform set of rules for the variety of rules provided by different national legal systems'. For instance, according to Professor Bhagwati Harmonization is asserted because it reduces the diversity in policies and laws of different jurisdictions. A uniformity of law is the desired outcome".

On the other side, Ancel took a severe outlook by holding that mere existence of diverse national laws is a motivation to engage in the harmonization procedure. It is further suggested that such multiplicity in local laws is detrimental to and affecting to the stability, creditability, and the superiority of the law. Further Professor Stephan advocated harmonization because it actualized a decline of 'legal risk'. Moreover minimizing legal risk followed by the transactions value.

Further, when divergences in national commercial laws are impediments, harmonization comes into operation as it can create an "interface" that assists parties from diverse jurisdictions. However, it is argued that so long as the national are dispositive, there is no requirement of uniformity. Additionally, investigations done by Professor Doreen McBarnet proclaims that experts favoured diversity, since it grants them preference together with the qualification to accomplish their principal intention, that is to procure the best legal system for their clients.

Harmonization is advocated as it reduces the difficulties and expenses connected with entering into international business transactions without being familiar with the laws and regulations applicable to the 'foreign tier' of any such transaction. According to Miller, transaction costs can be minimized by harmonization as the parties to international business transactions might have a rather better wisdom as compared they do in a diverse national system.

Further, Professor Fox has succinctly stated: "Disharmonies of law and procedure are costly and bothersome. As the world becomes increasingly interdependent the costs of different rules of law and different procedures that apply to the same transaction mount". Because of some transactions that would have taken place will not take place. Professor Goode also adhere this view by holding that harmonization substitutes a single law for a proliferation of national laws and therefore, it 'saves time and expense'.

For instance, a trader intending to export goods probably affronts a diverse transactional legal system for every nation to which goods are exported. In , the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OECD [] reviewed the existing studies on the costs associated with international trade transactions, for instance, trade insurance, cross-border payments, and so on. The OECD paper revealed that such costs hampered international commerce, especially in less developed countries.

Fox bespeaks that there are three reasons that argue against harmonization. While, according to David, there are three obstacles which jeopardize the realization of harmonization process. Firstly, the divergence of views as to what is just, moral, and in the interest of society. Secondly, the varying techniques employed for expounding rules of law. Lastly, "the principle difficulty hindering projects for international unification of the law consists of routine and of the prejudice of those who would have to be convinced before a new order can be constructed".

A number of eminent scholars assert that diversity has its own bereft of value. Harmonization and unification of laws destabilize improvement and significance of national legal regime. For instance, according to Goode, "there are those who consider that the English law in all its majesty is greatly superior to anything that could be devised at international level".

The eloquent exposition by Professor Wigore reveals the monotonous argument against harmonization: "it is not worth the effort to harmonize commercial law as any harmony that may have been crafted by the instrument is fleeting due to the possibility of divergent interpretations adopted by different courts".

Thus hampers the main objective of bringing harmonization, namely, uniformity. It is worthy to present observation by Viscount Simonds in Scruttons Ltd. Midland Silicones Ltd. The eminent Professor Wigmore also supported this line of reasoning. Similarly, it is asserted that domestic courts are reluctant to implement a globally oriented view towards the construction of international treaties and have acquiesced them great deference.

Monarch Airlines Ltd , [] "The language of an international convention has not been chosen by an English parliamentary draftsman It is addressed to a much wider and more varied judicial audience than is an act of parliament that deals with purely domestic law". The United States courts have also recognized this rule in several cases.

Tsui Yuan Tseng [] it was held that that to allow recourse to national law would undermine the uniform law that the Convention was designed to foster. It sent a clear signal that it would adopt an international approach to construing the convention. According to Sturley, there are so many topics in Hague Rules on which there exist clear conflicts in the interpretation. There are many specialists international or supranational organizations are involved in harmonization process.

The first three Instruments are recognized as "the three sisters". The mandate of Hague Conference is to work for the progressive unification of the rules of private international law". UNIDROIT'S main task is 'to examine methods for the harmonization and coordination of the private law of states and groups of states and to prepare for the progressive application of uniform private law'. UNIDROIT worked diligently to draft uniform conventions [] and model legislation for the purpose of obtaining universal codification of selected substantive and procedural laws in areas where uniformity was essential.

Though, this attempt was failed "due to the biased and isolated drafting process in which only the countries of Western Europe participated". As previously mentioned, after the failure of the Hague Conventions it is indispensable to establish a worldwide representative body. However, the most successful convention is the United Convention on Contract for the International Sale of Goods For instance, India had incorporated Arbitration and Conciliation Act, While drafting international contracts, parties can insert uniform or standard set of clauses in which all the relevant issues can be addressed.

Such activities include: organizing briefing missions and seminars and participating in conferences to familiarize participants with UNCITRAL texts; undertaking law reform assessments to assist governments of developing countries; and assisting international developed agencies, such as the World Bank.

The International Chamber of Commerce ICC [] is the 'voice of international businesses and was founded in with the aim 'to serve world business by promoting trade and investment, open markets for goods and services, and the free flow of capital'. It came into force as a multilateral convention on 1 January , after being ratified by eleven countries, for instance, United States of America and France.

By , it has been ratified by 77 countries from all around the world. Benin is the most recent state to have ratified the Convention. The CISG has been described as a 'great legislative achievement', [] 'most successful international document', [] "One size fits all" [] and "significant tool in international trade" []. As previously mentioned that the participation of the Hague Conventions are limited to the industrialized countries and adopted by the socialist and developing countries rarely. Secondly, only nine countries including the United Kingdom have ratified the Hague Conventions.

Lastly, Hague Conventions itself suffered from a number of procedural illnesses. While the CISG reduces transactional costs incurred in sales contract. For instance, its text 'will be more accessible to both parties and over time the accretion of case and commentary will provide more certainly'. The CISG represents the most successful attempt to unify international trade laws.

Further, it also simplifies global trade transactions as envisaged in the beautiful words of the Preamble:. The crucial function of an international trade law is to grant a standardized law to apply to the business persons. Firstly, the wide acceptance of the CISG by the global world is indeed the most successful strength of the Convention.

Furthermore, it is also entered into force in several South American States, for instance, Egypt, Columbia and Argentina. On the other hand, the roles of African countries are more limited including Liberia, Zambia and Ghana. It is supported that in the near future it will 'become the law applicable to the majority of all contracts for the international sale of goods'.

Also, the definition of the effectiveness of the offer defined under section 2. It is noteworthy to mention European Council EC Directives on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees [] that was also greatly inspired by the CISG. The reflection can be found in article 2 that examines the conformity aspect of the contract.

It is suggested that this provision derived its authority from the article 35 of the CISG. On the other hand, the CISG is not only a welcome effort of unification of sales law on international arena but also proved to be fruitful effort 'for domestic legislators'. For instance, article 16 of this legislation that defines the effectiveness of the contract took its definition from article 15 of the CISG. The most common criticism of the Convention is that it failed to define many important legal expressions referred in the CISG.

It is also argued that it defined a number of terms that created difficulties for transnational solicitors. For example, the CISG defined the term "sufficient definite" [] that creates a trouble for the American lawyers. Under Uniform Civil Code U. Further it is commonly argued that the Convention is limited in scope [] as it is only applied to the community that is engaged in the international sale of goods and exclude sales 'of goods for 'personal, family, or household use'. Article 7 1 stated:. Thus in simpler stipulations, it laid down three principles on which the interpretation of the CISG is appreciated.

The first principle states that the CISG is interpreted in conjunction with its international character that means autonomous from the set of rules governing domestic laws. At this point one may be reminded of Professor Goode who claimed that this was an elusive concept. As there is no international business court to deliver judgment on the CISG's interpretation, it is often found that domestic court interpret its provision by domestic law that discard the objective on which CISG is based: uniformity and harmonization of international sales laws.

On the other hand it is suggested that the insertion of the expression 'international character' is an exhortation to avoid the trap of a homeward tendency in interpretation [] and to urge the courts to look at what other courts are doing. However, in the real CISG world, however, national courts occasionally slip into a parochial morass, especially when the relevant Convention terminology is reminiscent of their own local law.

However, the reason seems to exist in the assertion, as previously mentioned, that there is a lack 'of a supranational organ capable of ensuring its uniform interpretation'. The next problem lies in the second principle that lay down that convention is interpreted uniformly by all courts. However, in practical business world it is often not found. This is because of the limited sphere of the application of the Convention. The state 'A' entered into a contract of tiny silicon computer "chips" with state 'B'. Such 'chips' are goods in the domestic law of A but not B.

Both the states are non- members of the CISG. In any case if A is found guilty of breach of contract then A is advised 'to hurriedly forum- shop' to another state, for instance 'C' where such chips are goods.

In this way, A can be relieved from the liability incurred if the case might bring in its own state. Thus, in some probability, it encourages forum shopping. On the other side it is argued that it fails to concentrate on some important aspect of sales contract: carriage of goods by sea. It does not examine the role of electronic documentation and electronic commerce in sales contract that become an important aspect of sales contract in modern time.

Its main purpose is to bring uniformity of laws under carriage contract. On the basis of this, many commentators argued that it failed to accomplish its task of bringing uniformity and predictability to international sales law. On the other side national courts evaluate the provisions of the CISG differently. Surprisingly, UK had actively participated in the development of international sales laws [] but failed to accede to the "major gap-filling convention" - CISG.

It was suggested that the UK awaited the reaction of its trading partners, for instance, the United States and Australia. In first Consultation Paper 1, documents were issued and only 28 were in favour to ratify the convention out of total 55 responses. Consequently, in , another Consultative Paper was issued that was strongly favoured mostly by the Law Commission of England and Wales and British Gas. Consequently, DTI issued a position paper in February stating that the Convention should be brought into national law when there is time available in the legislative programme.

Lord Sainsbury replied:. There have been delays in the past for a number of reasons, but we propose to issue a consultation document in the course of the next few months to examine the available options". Since then, neither any consultation nor any replacement date has yet been issued and decided respectively. This argument appears to be quite right in the light of the vastly greater volume and complexity of legislation. According to Moss, Ratification would need legislation and the CISG must take its place in the queue with the Government's many other legislative priorities.

Further it is submitted that there is most definitively a self-perception that English law is a world brand-name [] as UK has been positioned as the leading centre for the settlement of commercial disputes. Other critics posit: 'the superiority of English sales law'. For instance, under article 25 of the CISG, the contract is said to be avoided on the ground of fundamental breach [] that "…. In other words, every term of the contract becomes an innominate term and the breach of which gives rise to the avoidance of contract.

While under English law [] such certainty is not required. Further, it is suggested that if the UK government will ratify the convention, there is menace that English lords will apply three well-known English principles of interpretation rather than applying the rule of interpretation that is articulated under article 31 of the Convention on the Law of Treaties while interpreting the provisions of the CISG. However in recent decisions, English judges have migrated to the above mentioned principle and apply the purposive method in interpretation of the international conventions.

https://grupoavigase.com/includes/108/551-gente-en-burgos.php

Business Law in Africa: Ohada and the Harmonization Process (Global Market Briefings)

While in Fothergill v. Monarch Airlines , [] the House of Lords acknowledged the interpretation rule articulated under article 31 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Transnational commercial law is that branch of law that enumerates the rights and duties of the parties that are engaged in cross border commercial activities.

Such activities can take various forms ranging from the simplest form- trade to the most complicated kind- foreign direct investment. Such set of rules derive their force from various codified and uncodified principles. Uncodified rules consist of customs and usages of merchants that grown since the Middle Ages. While codified rules are promulgated by several international organizations and it is worth taking to mention the United Nations Commission of International Trade Law UNCITRAL that contributes to a far extend in the development of international business law.

Pre-owned: lowest price The lowest-priced item that has been used or worn previously. Great condition for a used book! Minimal wear. Shipped to over one million happy customers. See details. Buy It Now. Add to cart. Sellers and Nanette Pilkington , Paperback. Be the first to write a review About this product.

About this product Product Information Legal harmonization is an essential step to encouraging foreign investment in Africa and the development of sustainable pan-African trade. Now in a fully updated 2nd edition, Business Law in Africa explains the new system of law, now being developed and promoted by the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa.